langchain · difficulty ◆◆
batch_iterate and abatch_iterate Finally Agree
Chunk your inputs the same way whether you call the sync or the async twin.
The async twin of your batch helper used to disagree with the sync one on the edge cases - and that disagreement could crash a production pipeline.
$ pip install -U langchain-core==1.5.5What it does
batch_iterate() and its async twin abatch_iterate() are the helpers you reach for when you need to split a big list of inputs into fixed-size chunks before feeding them to a model or a chain. The bug that langchain-core 1.5.5 fixes: when you passed None as the batch size, or a batch size of 0, the async version behaved differently from the sync one. One would raise, the other would silently return nothing - or a zero-size batch could spin out an empty or infinite generator. The fix makes the async path match the sync path exactly: None means "no batching" (yield the whole list as one batch) and 0 is rejected consistently with a clear error. Your code now behaves identically whether you call the sync or async variant.
Why it matters
Real-world LangChain apps routinely chew through large input sets - thousands of documents to embed, hundreds of prompts to run, a big CSV of rows to classify. batch_iterate and abatch_iterate are the idiomatic way to chunk those inputs so you do not blow up memory or trip provider rate limits. The danger of a sync/async mismatch is subtle: you write a pipeline that works fine with batch_iterate, then switch to abatch_iterate for concurrency and suddenly get different chunking - or a crash - for edge-case batch sizes. This fix removes that footgun, so you can confidently use the async variant in production with the same semantics. That matters for any agent or ETL job that must behave predictably at scale.
Example
$ Chunk a list of 10 inputs into batches of 3, then confirm None means "no batching"batch_iterate(size=3):
[0, 1, 2]
[3, 4, 5]
[6, 7, 8]
[9]
batch_iterate(size=None):
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
abatch_iterate(size=3):
[0, 1, 2]
[3, 4, 5]
[6, 7, 8]
[9]
batch_iterate(0) -> batch_size must be a positive integerThe async variant now produces the exact same chunk boundaries as the sync one.
$ Reject a zero batch size consistently in both variantstry:
list(batch_iterate(0, inputs))
except ValueError as e:
print("batch_iterate(0) ->", e)
# batch_iterate(0) -> batch_size must be a positive integerCommon flags
- batch_iterate
- Sync helper that chunks an iterable into fixed-size batches.
- abatch_iterate
- Async twin of batch_iterate; now consistent for None and zero size.
- Runnable.batch
- Batch-invoke a runnable over a list of inputs (built-in batching).
- Runnable.abatch
- Async batch-invoke a runnable over a list of inputs.
History
Two twins that drifted apart
batch_iterate and abatch_iterate were written to be mirror images of each other - same signature, same chunking logic, one sync and one async. But as is the way with twins, they drifted. The async path handled the None and zero edge cases differently from the sync path, and nobody noticed until someone hit a production pipeline that chunked fine in sync and misbehaved the moment it went async. The 1.5.5 fix is a consistency patch: it re-aligns the async twin to the sync twin so the two can never disagree again.
Fun facts
Pros & cons
pros
- + Identical semantics across sync and async
- + Clear error for zero batch size
- + None cleanly means "no batching"
- + Drop-in async replacement for concurrency
cons
- − Requires langchain-core>=1.5.5
- − Edge-case behavior change could surprise code that relied on the old quirk
Takeaways
- 1Upgrade to langchain-core>=1.5.5 for the consistency fix.
- 2Use None to mean "no batching" in both sync and async.
- 3Never pass a zero batch size - it now raises a clear error.
- 4Switch to abatch_iterate for concurrency with identical chunk boundaries.